Episode 47

E47: Non-Compete are Niche Killers!

Do you know my nickname for “non-competes”?  “Niche killers.”  

A non-compete is a provision that restricts your ability to seek and work with similar clients.  And what is a group of similar clients?  A niche! 

Non-competes are the enemy of strong positioning. Being the go-to person for a niche increases profitability and authority.

In this episode, I discuss how to identify and negotiate these controversial provisions. A few topics we will be talking about are:

  • Improving your profitability by focusing on your niche
  • Ways to narrow down the non-compete provision as a means of compromise
  • The importance of negotiating an agreement to protect your business 

This was an intentionally surface-level discussion; don’t hesitate to send me a message with your questions.

Connect with Erin and find the resources mentioned in this episode at hourlytoexit.com/podcast.

Erin's LinkedIn Page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/erinaustin/

Think Beyond IP YouTube Page: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVztXnDYnZ83oIb-EGX9IGA/videos

Music credit: Yes She Can by Tiny Music

A Team Dklutr production

Transcript
Speaker:

Hello everyone.

Speaker:

Welcome to LinkedIn Live.

Speaker:

I have these every last Wednesday of

Speaker:

the month, at noon.

Speaker:

Eastern.

Speaker:

So, again, Erin Austin, very happy

Speaker:

to be here with you, founder of

Speaker:

Think Beyond ip, we talk about.

Speaker:

Issues that help you scale and

Speaker:

hopefully someday sell your business.

Speaker:

this is being recorded live on

Speaker:

LinkedIn live, but it's also going to

Speaker:

be, distributed as part of my podcast.

Speaker:

Hourly to exit.

Speaker:

So just to let you know if you are

Speaker:

listening to this on the podcast,

Speaker:

that there are some slides that

Speaker:

go with this conversation that

Speaker:

will be helpful.

Speaker:

So you can find them either over,

Speaker:

my YouTube channel for Think Beyond

Speaker:

ip, YouTube channel, or, I will have

Speaker:

that there's a link to the slides

Speaker:

actually in the show notes as well.

Speaker:

either way, you should be

Speaker:

able to get.

Speaker:

The full benefit of our conversation

Speaker:

today, Feel free to put,

Speaker:

questions in the chat at any time.

Speaker:

Today we're going to talk about

Speaker:

non-competes, which I call niche

Speaker:

killers, and, that will become

Speaker:

very, obvious.

Speaker:

Why, as we go through our

Speaker:

conversation.

Speaker:

first, what is a non-compete?

Speaker:

So, non-compete is a restrictive

Speaker:

covenant, and you'll find it as

Speaker:

a provision in your client agreements

Speaker:

where they restrict your ability or

Speaker:

maybe even prohibit you from working

Speaker:

with any of their competitors.

Speaker:

what is a group of competitors?

Speaker:

If you specialize in working with

Speaker:

law firms or you specialize working

Speaker:

with doctors, or you specialize working

Speaker:

with teachers, a group of competitors

Speaker:

is a niche.

Speaker:

And so that specialized

Speaker:

segment for your goods or services.

Speaker:

Now, if you are here, you've

Speaker:

probably heard a million times that,

Speaker:

riches are in the niches there are

Speaker:

tons of resources, if you haven't heard

Speaker:

that before, that I can point you to.

Speaker:

I love the, business of

Speaker:

Authority podcast.

Speaker:

Talks about that a lot.

Speaker:

Jonathan Stark and Rochelle Moton.

Speaker:

also, biz Chicks talks

Speaker:

about it a lot.

Speaker:

the two bobs, there's so many

Speaker:

resources to tell you about the value

Speaker:

of having a niche.

Speaker:

Now, just to go over them very

Speaker:

quickly here, one, know, to be fishing

Speaker:

in a, Small pool instead of fishing

Speaker:

in an ocean.

Speaker:

Your resources are the same whether

Speaker:

you're fishing in an ocean or you're

Speaker:

fishing in a pond, and so you're

Speaker:

gonna be a lot more effective fishing

Speaker:

in a pond with your resources than

Speaker:

you are fishing in an ocean.

Speaker:

Also, when you have a niche, you

Speaker:

get very strong positioning.

Speaker:

You become known as the go-to person

Speaker:

or the authority in your area, and that

Speaker:

is only possible within a niche.

Speaker:

You have less spending on

Speaker:

your marketing.

Speaker:

When you are known as the authority or

Speaker:

the go-to person, then you are

Speaker:

highly referable.

Speaker:

People will know, oh, I know

Speaker:

exactly You are an accountant

Speaker:

and you need help with your S E O.

Speaker:

I know exactly who you need to talk to.

Speaker:

So you become very referable and,

Speaker:

therefore spend less on marketing

Speaker:

when you are known as the authority

Speaker:

in an area you can.

Speaker:

command higher premium pricing.

Speaker:

You cannot get those premium pricing when

Speaker:

you are just another SEO expert or just

Speaker:

another copywriter.

Speaker:

and then it, of course, it

Speaker:

accelerates the development of

Speaker:

your expertise.

Speaker:

When you are working in a specific

Speaker:

area, you get to know intimately

Speaker:

the issues that your clients have,

Speaker:

their businesses really well, you

Speaker:

know the language that they, speak

Speaker:

and that helps you really accelerate

Speaker:

your expertise.

Speaker:

It's all kind of builds on

Speaker:

each other.

Speaker:

And so if riches are in the niches,

Speaker:

then what is in non-competes?

Speaker:

And so it's really kind of the opposite

Speaker:

of what's, the riches In the

Speaker:

niches, you have weak positioning.

Speaker:

if you are working, if you're doing

Speaker:

SEO o for every different kind of

Speaker:

client, it is very hard to have a

Speaker:

strong positioning, as they say.

Speaker:

If you work with everyone, then you

Speaker:

work with no one.

Speaker:

Your messaging is very squishy.

Speaker:

Are you talking to, clients who

Speaker:

serve customers, or are you talking

Speaker:

to clients who serve patients, or

Speaker:

are you talking to clients that serve,

Speaker:

collaborators like.

Speaker:

Who are you talking to?

Speaker:

What is the language that they're using?

Speaker:

And that's hard to do if you don't

Speaker:

have a niche.

Speaker:

You get a grab bag of clients.

Speaker:

in the legal world they're called, the,

Speaker:

front door clients.

Speaker:

Like anyone who walks through the

Speaker:

front door is your client is, and that

Speaker:

generalist, law practice that's,

Speaker:

Actually, pretty hard to maintain.

Speaker:

the more niched a lawyer is, the

Speaker:

higher and more premium prices

Speaker:

they can command.

Speaker:

And that applies to many other areas of

Speaker:

expertise as well.

Speaker:

And then if you are getting referrals

Speaker:

at all, cuz sometimes you aren't

Speaker:

because people.

Speaker:

Find it hard to refer to you.

Speaker:

They aren't the right kind

Speaker:

of referrals.

Speaker:

They don't quite understand

Speaker:

what you do.

Speaker:

so if they just hear some random

Speaker:

buzzword, then they'll go, oh yeah,

Speaker:

I think you need to talk to this person.

Speaker:

And then you spend time on the phone

Speaker:

with them and find out that they're

Speaker:

not the right referral for you.

Speaker:

It's much harder to build valuable

Speaker:

IP because again, you're kind of all

Speaker:

over the place and often you'll find

Speaker:

yourself reduced to selling your time

Speaker:

instead of selling your expertise.

Speaker:

these are the reasons we don't

Speaker:

like non-competes, which interfere

Speaker:

in our ability to create niches and

Speaker:

all the wonderful riches that

Speaker:

come with them.

Speaker:

So let's talk about some

Speaker:

specific examples of non-compete

Speaker:

provisions that you will see in your

Speaker:

services agreements.

Speaker:

again, look for the slides if you are

Speaker:

listening to this on the podcast.

Speaker:

So my first example, which, involves

Speaker:

when you are the subcontractor and

Speaker:

there is an end client it is not.

Speaker:

That unusual for your immediate

Speaker:

client to want to prevent you as a

Speaker:

subcontractor from doing an end run

Speaker:

and serving that end client directly?

Speaker:

not that I'm a huge.

Speaker:

Antifa of non-competes, but

Speaker:

the only time I'm not offended by

Speaker:

non-competes is in this circumstance,

Speaker:

it is fair for your client not

Speaker:

to expect you to like, do the end

Speaker:

run and go directly to the end client.

Speaker:

for those services that you've been

Speaker:

engaged to do.

Speaker:

in this example, if the contractor

Speaker:

provides services to a client of

Speaker:

company under this agreement,

Speaker:

subcontractor agrees not to independently

Speaker:

contract to provide services to such

Speaker:

client during the same period and for

Speaker:

a period of one year after completion,

Speaker:

expiration, or termination of

Speaker:

such services.

Speaker:

If subcontractor has an existing

Speaker:

agreement in place with a company

Speaker:

client prior to the effective date of

Speaker:

this agreement, any services provided

Speaker:

by subcontractor pursuant to that

Speaker:

agreement are excluded from

Speaker:

the proceeding restriction.

Speaker:

And just to clarify, in this

Speaker:

example, you are the subcontractor

Speaker:

and your client is company and then

Speaker:

company client would be the end client.

Speaker:

And so this is an example where, your

Speaker:

client does not want you to do an end

Speaker:

run to go directly to the end client.

Speaker:

That said, it is still too broad.

Speaker:

There are a number of issues that

Speaker:

I have with that provision and, In

Speaker:

this next slide, I am, addressing

Speaker:

the way that I would remedy this

Speaker:

to make it more reasonable so it

Speaker:

doesn't interfere with your ability to

Speaker:

create your niche.

Speaker:

I e work with competitors of your

Speaker:

client, In this one, one, you need to

Speaker:

make sure that you actually know who

Speaker:

that end client is.

Speaker:

Depending on the nature of your

Speaker:

services, sometimes you don't know who

Speaker:

the end client is.

Speaker:

Maybe you're brought in just

Speaker:

to do something specifically.

Speaker:

Maybe, in the market research field,

Speaker:

you may be brought in to provide.

Speaker:

respondents and you don't know who

Speaker:

the end client is, so you certainly

Speaker:

don't want to agree to, not provide,

Speaker:

services with an end client that you're

Speaker:

not even aware of.

Speaker:

So you, would, accidentally breach

Speaker:

your agreement.

Speaker:

Also, you may provide services

Speaker:

that don't actually compete

Speaker:

with your client.

Speaker:

You may be in completely different

Speaker:

industries, but your client is providing

Speaker:

kind of a 360 degree, solution.

Speaker:

And so they need to bring in

Speaker:

subcontractors in order.

Speaker:

To fill in the blanks where they

Speaker:

don't have that expertise in house.

Speaker:

So if you are not competing with your

Speaker:

client, there's no reason for you to

Speaker:

not be able to work with that end client

Speaker:

providing services that don't even

Speaker:

compete with your immediate client.

Speaker:

So you wanna make sure it's clear

Speaker:

that any non-compete would apply only

Speaker:

to services that compete with your

Speaker:

immediate client.

Speaker:

Also for that one year tale, that one

Speaker:

year non-compete period after your

Speaker:

services have been completed.

Speaker:

the point is for you to not poach

Speaker:

this client, the point is not for.

Speaker:

There to be some exclusive market

Speaker:

that only your client can play in.

Speaker:

You have your own expertise, they have

Speaker:

their expertise.

Speaker:

You should be able to go out in the

Speaker:

market and compete in the market

Speaker:

based on your expertise without

Speaker:

any restrictions.

Speaker:

And so that non-compete period

Speaker:

just apply to providing services

Speaker:

to that client in connection with

Speaker:

this engagement.

Speaker:

And then, never, agree to anything

Speaker:

that will interfere with your current

Speaker:

relationships.

Speaker:

As an expert, one of your most valuable

Speaker:

assets are your relationships.

Speaker:

So if you have relationships

Speaker:

either that you're cultivating or.

Speaker:

That are with actual clients, you want to

Speaker:

be able to continue to cultivate those

Speaker:

relationships.

Speaker:

You don't want anything to come

Speaker:

between you and that, obviously

Speaker:

if you have a client that has,

Speaker:

worked with you in the past and they

Speaker:

come back to you, can you imagine

Speaker:

having to say no?

Speaker:

because of one of these non-compete

Speaker:

provisions.

Speaker:

So make sure that it doesn't apply that

Speaker:

any non-compete.

Speaker:

Not only carves out existing agreements

Speaker:

but it also carves out existing

Speaker:

relationships.

Speaker:

Another example.

Speaker:

So this is, a more general

Speaker:

non-compete, not the subcontractor

Speaker:

scenario, but it is just you and your

Speaker:

client may, have engage with the

Speaker:

same market from time to time, and

Speaker:

your client just wants you completely

Speaker:

out of the market.

Speaker:

and just because you've worked

Speaker:

together on this one specific

Speaker:

project, and that is unreasonable.

Speaker:

So this language during the term

Speaker:

of this agreement, and for a period

Speaker:

of one year after the termination

Speaker:

of this agreement.

Speaker:

Contractor shall not engage in

Speaker:

any employment, consulting, or

Speaker:

other activity that competes

Speaker:

with the business.

Speaker:

Proposed business or business interest

Speaker:

of company and contractor will not

Speaker:

assist any other person or entity

Speaker:

in doing so without company's prior

Speaker:

written consent.

Speaker:

There are many, many things wrong

Speaker:

with this provision.

Speaker:

So many that my recommendation is

Speaker:

to simply strike it.

Speaker:

you're not in the business of

Speaker:

carving up the market for using

Speaker:

your expertise.

Speaker:

you have yours, they have theirs, and

Speaker:

you should be able to go out into the

Speaker:

market and compete.

Speaker:

As the market, demands.

Speaker:

step one is try to eliminate it

Speaker:

all together.

Speaker:

Now, any contract negotiation depends

Speaker:

on the relative, negotiating power

Speaker:

of each And so there may be a reason

Speaker:

that you need to agree to some level

Speaker:

of non-compete, and so you need

Speaker:

to negotiate this provision.

Speaker:

So here my recommendation, the

Speaker:

fallback position would be first limit

Speaker:

the term or the non-compete to the

Speaker:

term that you're working together.

Speaker:

Two, the restriction on Doing competing

Speaker:

employment or other activity

Speaker:

is far too broad.

Speaker:

maybe you are solo and one of your

Speaker:

other clients, wants you to go in

Speaker:

house and that is a competing client.

Speaker:

There should be no restriction

Speaker:

on your ability to go in-house

Speaker:

with a client and provide services.

Speaker:

you will always be subject to the

Speaker:

non-disclosure obligations.

Speaker:

You, of course, are not permitted to use

Speaker:

any other party's, intellectual

Speaker:

property or their secrets without

Speaker:

their permission, but for you to use

Speaker:

your expertise, you can use it

Speaker:

with anyone.

Speaker:

and so we're limiting that

Speaker:

language, that competes with

Speaker:

the services, they have here.

Speaker:

You can't compete with proposed

Speaker:

business or business interest.

Speaker:

I mean, how broad is that?

Speaker:

How would you possibly know what

Speaker:

other proposed business, prospects

Speaker:

they're looking at, what other business

Speaker:

interests they have other than what

Speaker:

you're directly engaged to perform.

Speaker:

So you need to eliminate anything

Speaker:

that is so broad and so vague as proposed

Speaker:

business interests.

Speaker:

and then you can't, assist.

Speaker:

Well again, you may not know that one

Speaker:

of your clients, is a competitor

Speaker:

of the old client.

Speaker:

you can't, be in a position of

Speaker:

accidentally an agreement because

Speaker:

you're not aware of who the end

Speaker:

clients are.

Speaker:

And again, always, always, make sure

Speaker:

that any restriction does not apply to

Speaker:

your preexisting relationships.

Speaker:

Now, there is a provision here

Speaker:

called interference.

Speaker:

This is a real provision that came

Speaker:

from a services agreement that.

Speaker:

Absolutely blew my mind when I saw it.

Speaker:

And I think, you don't need to be

Speaker:

a lawyer to know why this, provision

Speaker:

is so outrageous.

Speaker:

during the term of this agreement,

Speaker:

and for a period of one year following

Speaker:

termination or expiration of

Speaker:

this agreement, supplier agrees

Speaker:

not to induce.

Speaker:

Or attempt to induce influence or attempt

Speaker:

to influence any client, supplier

Speaker:

or other business relation of company

Speaker:

or any affiliate of company deceased

Speaker:

doing business.

Speaker:

Terminate or modify any written or

Speaker:

oral agreement, arrangement or

Speaker:

course of dealing or to otherwise

Speaker:

interfere with the business

Speaker:

relationship.

Speaker:

This is so broad that you literally

Speaker:

couldn't, like what can you do

Speaker:

that doesn't breach this provision?

Speaker:

anytime you talk to another client,

Speaker:

another supplier or other business

Speaker:

relation, I mean all sorts of people

Speaker:

we have business relationships

Speaker:

with, that might.

Speaker:

Caused them to work with you instead

Speaker:

of with them and all those things.

Speaker:

Even attempting to, not even succeeding

Speaker:

to, but just having a conversation

Speaker:

about possibly working together

Speaker:

would breach this provision.

Speaker:

This is a hundred percent unreasonable

Speaker:

and, absolutely, would be something

Speaker:

that could.

Speaker:

Kill your business and as a general

Speaker:

rule, you know, even with provisions

Speaker:

that seem a little more reasonable,

Speaker:

such as the very first one regarding

Speaker:

the subcontractor arrangements, you

Speaker:

need to think about.

Speaker:

The overall effect of agreeing to

Speaker:

provisions like this, any version

Speaker:

of non-compete or non-solicitation.

Speaker:

You if you agreed to the language

Speaker:

that this particular client is asking

Speaker:

you to agree to, and you did that

Speaker:

with every client, be out of business?

Speaker:

Like what would be left if with

Speaker:

every client you said, okay, I won't

Speaker:

work with any of your competitors.

Speaker:

And so that eliminates 20%

Speaker:

of the market and then you do it

Speaker:

with another one, eliminates another

Speaker:

20% and another one pretty soon you're

Speaker:

out of business.

Speaker:

So you really need to think about the

Speaker:

overall effect of agreeing going,

Speaker:

just slippery slope of non-competes,

Speaker:

when you think about that.

Speaker:

make sure that.

Speaker:

You don't lose that when you're,

Speaker:

negotiating with your clients.

Speaker:

So the key takeaways here, You need to

Speaker:

restrict any type of non-compete.

Speaker:

You know, first try to get rid of 'em,

Speaker:

but if you can't, make sure that any

Speaker:

restriction is as narrow as possible

Speaker:

in terms of the time that it applies,

Speaker:

who it applies to and what services

Speaker:

it applies to.

Speaker:

Make sure that standard carve

Speaker:

out is there any preexisting

Speaker:

relationships must be carved out.

Speaker:

most importantly, don't be afraid

Speaker:

to stand up for your business.

Speaker:

It is a B two B relationship.

Speaker:

You are partners in making sure that

Speaker:

both parties have, a happy resolution.

Speaker:

Any business relationship where

Speaker:

both parties don't feel like they got

Speaker:

value from it is an unsuccessful one.

Speaker:

And so the other party does want you

Speaker:

to feel good about their relationship

Speaker:

as well.

Speaker:

And they are set up for you to have

Speaker:

conversations about those provisions.

Speaker:

What do I do if my client insists

Speaker:

on including a non-compete?

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, sometimes as it

Speaker:

will happen, and again, depending on

Speaker:

the nature of your industry, it will

Speaker:

be very important for them to know

Speaker:

that you aren't.

Speaker:

Working with their competitors.

Speaker:

Certainly if you're doing anything that

Speaker:

involves access to your client's

Speaker:

trade secrets, they are going to,

Speaker:

probably insist on having some version

Speaker:

of a non-compete.

Speaker:

And so again, you're going to have to

Speaker:

just make sure that it is as narrow in

Speaker:

scope as possible.

Speaker:

and even specific to, maybe let's

Speaker:

say it is a pharmaceutical

Speaker:

company and they you to not work with any

Speaker:

other pharmaceutical companies, maybe try

Speaker:

to get it as narrow as We won't work

Speaker:

with someone who is in the same category

Speaker:

of drug, know, diabetes drugs or

Speaker:

hypertension drugs.

Speaker:

So as narrow as you can make it

Speaker:

so that, you can still work with

Speaker:

other pharmaceutical companies.

Speaker:

You certainly there are a lot

Speaker:

of pharmaceutical companies, although

Speaker:

they may be competitors on the

Speaker:

surface, they really aren't because they

Speaker:

work in different areas of, therapy.

Speaker:

that would be my recommendation.

Speaker:

Um, again, just as narrow as possible

Speaker:

and making sure that you can

Speaker:

continue to work with your existing

Speaker:

relationships.

Speaker:

one other thing I wanna add, Is

Speaker:

when they ask you to come and get

Speaker:

their approval of working with

Speaker:

any competitors.

Speaker:

That is generally not workable.

Speaker:

Your clients are not going to want you to

Speaker:

talk to your other clients about who

Speaker:

you're working with and they wouldn't

Speaker:

want you to.

Speaker:

so anything that says you need to

Speaker:

come to us and get approval really

Speaker:

isn't workable.

Speaker:

You need to just make sure that

Speaker:

there are very clear parameters that

Speaker:

you can work with.

Speaker:

so that you can continue to grow

Speaker:

your business, create a niche

Speaker:

so that you can develop, a high

Speaker:

value business, where you're known

Speaker:

as the authority in the business

Speaker:

can command premium prices,

Speaker:

can accelerate your expertise all

Speaker:

the riches that come with niches.

Speaker:

So, Thank you for joining me and all

Speaker:

the links, will be in the show

Speaker:

notes and of course if you have any

Speaker:

questions, please don't hesitate

Speaker:

to contact me.

Speaker:

Oh, actually have contact page.

Speaker:

you can find me on LinkedIn.

Speaker:

I am the Erin Austin, without

Speaker:

Thethe of course, and I also have

Speaker:

many resources.

Speaker:

On my website, think beyond@ip.com

Speaker:

where you can find me as well.

Speaker:

So thanks again for joining me.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Hourly to Exit
Hourly to Exit

About your host

Profile picture for Erin Austin

Erin Austin

Meet Erin Austin, a Harvard Law alum with over 25 years of copyright and contracts experience. As the go-to advisor for professionals with corporate clients, Erin empowers entrepreneurs to be their own advocates, standing out for her commitment to transforming expertise into empires through the creation, protection and leveraging of intellectual property assets. Explore her blend of legal expertise and entrepreneurial insight on ThinkBeyondIP.com and the "Hourly to Exit" podcast. Off the clock, you'll find Erin in the great outdoors or connecting with business coaches to elevate 6-figure consultants into 7-figure powerhouses.